> ... which is, of course, silly. And the author should know that. This is not sufficient to explain to people why there are no rich conspirators hiding wealth

> ... which is, of course, silly. And the author should know that. This is not sufficient to explain to people why there are no rich conspirators hiding wealth. Mind you, I mostly agree with you. But I personally feel we need to have as simple as possible, verifiable, non debated arguments before we are allowed to think of things as silly. > ... which is, of course, silly. And the author should know that, since I assume he is aware of $clear_refutation Otherwise we either delude yourselves or dismiss others