I'm a bit confused after reading your post, especially your first paragraph. So no sarcasm intended here, just curiosity. > you're still nowhere near all the C

I'm a bit confused after reading your post, especially your first paragraph. So no sarcasm intended here, just curiosity. > you're still nowhere near all the Chinese real estate magnates, Saudi oil magnates, the people whose family fortune has been accumulating for the past hundred years or so, etc. Are you implying those people would be richer than the publicly wealthy we know of (the Walton family, Gates, Buffet etc.)? If that is not the case, I don't think "inconceivable" is the word I would use in this case..