4 ms·
> my impression is that interest in chess has declined a lot. I don't think it has. Much like horseback riding has not made olympic races obsolete, human compe
by espadrine 10y ago
> my impression is that interest in chess has declined a lot.
I don't think it has. Much like horseback riding has not made olympic races obsolete, human competition remained fascinating. I for one very much followed the rise of Magnus Carlsen.
- olalonde 10y agoThat was a poorly chosen example since interest in horseback riding has declined a lot, at least in relative terms, compared to the pre car days. Today, auto racing as a competitive sport is probably more popular too. Personally, the fact that computers are better at chess than humans makes me less interested in the game so I'm a bit biased.
- dmoy 10y agoThe argument is that the presence of horseback riding (and now race car driving) doesn't necessarily diminish the popularity of foot races. Not that horse racing is less popular now (though that my be, simply because it's no longer anyone's preferred method of transportation...)
- olalonde 10y agoAh, I missed that. It's hard to say with certainty whether horseback riding diminished the popularity of foot races since it happened such a long time ago and at a time where probably neither was considered a sport or entertainment. I do think that technological advances in general affect the appeal of certain games and sports by rendering them less mysterious or by bringing them further from a real world activity/situation. Of course, I'm talking about relative, not absolute, popularity. Chess and horseback riding will remain popular for a long, long time.