3 ms·
Datastax seems to think that it is a good idea: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/consensus-on-cassandra http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/consensus-on-cassandra
by chungtg 10y ago
Datastax seems to think that it is a good idea: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/consensus-on-cassandra http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/consensus-on-cassandra
- user5994461 10y agoThat piece was written in 2014, which was a different time ;) Plus, if we were to take the vendor words at face value, we'd all be using Docker and MongoDB in production.
- flurdy 10y ago:) My last client (very, very big client) for the past year ran nearly all their production systems with Docker and MongoDb... Never had any problems with Docker. MongoDB on the other hand... Suffice to say it is really fragile when spread across multiple datacentres, which is probably not a surprise to HN.
- djsumdog 10y agoI work for a large company that used docker in production. A lot of companies are. There are a lot of big names using Kubernetes, Mesos or some other container orchestration system.
- ddorian43 10y agoJust like many companies use mongodb and nanoservices.
- pkolaczk 10y agoDetails matter. All updates in the Datastax post are protected by LWT. That code is correct. The OP's code was wrong, because he was mixing non-LWT updates.