3 ms·
What are your problems with Qt? I was using PyQt, and I found it nice (Qt's integration is good).
by witty_username 10y ago
What are your problems with Qt?
I was using PyQt, and I found it nice (Qt's integration is good).
- K0nserv 10y agoI was using C++ Qt. Just found it really unintuitive and difficult to use compared to web technologies and native macOS development.
- witty_username 10y agoCould you give an example of something that was unintuitive or difficult to use?
- freeone3000 10y agoC++ Qt, I've found, is an entire separate beast. It goes out of its way to not rely on the STL, so that std::string and QString are separate, non-convertible classes. QList and std::list<> are the same, same for QMap and so on and so forth. So data communication is already a pain. We then have further issues with function invocation. Slots and sockets are simple with python, because functions are first-class in python. In C++, they are very much not, so slot-socket binding looks like: connect(sender, SIGNAL (valueChanged(QString,QString)), receiver, SLOT (updateValue(QString)) ); This is less than ideal.
- pjmlp 10y agoWhen having to deal with compilers that barely support a mix of C++98 and C++03, Qt is quite good. STL wasn't always here and still isn't in some embedded platforms.