3 ms·
You're saying that if someone you disagreed with changed your words of protest, it'd be all cool and good?
by brink 10y ago
You're saying that if someone you disagreed with changed your words of protest, it'd be all cool and good?
- woodruffw 10y ago"Words of protest" is an interesting way to put it. They were bare insults, contextualized by (barely validated) paranoia. The analogy of the rioter among peaceful protesters doesn't really apply to the circumstance, but it's poetic given the situation.
- samstave 10y agoThats NOT what is being debated. Who cares if you might be "literally hitler" for example. If you call me "literally hitler" should I be able to edit your post to say, instead, "literally awesome!!!1"?
- woodruffw 10y agoI was responding to the parent. Debate is fruitless when the chief facts are mischaracterized in an attempt to soften their impact. Edit: It looks like the parent edited their comment. That's unfortunate.