3 ms·
To clarify, are you suggesting that someone was indicted based purely on a Reddit post? If so, that in itself is scarier than anything else being discussed her
by joncalhoun 10y ago
To clarify, are you suggesting that someone was indicted based purely on a Reddit post?
If so, that in itself is scarier than anything else being discussed here.
To assume Reddit is a unedited source of truth is just insane. Why people felt it was 100% tamper proof is beyond me. I wouldn't even trust public companies like Twitter to not have potential flaws like this.
- angry-hacker 10y agoYes, yes he was. [0] It's nothing new in UK, they are literally CCTV state now. Don't forget American folks that in most of the countries over here we don't have free speech ;) And in the light of this news that Reddit CEO edited comments -- it's scary stuff -- for fun or not. [0] http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/watch-moment-web-troll-who-11918656 http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/watch-mom...
- aktiur 10y agoYour source says he admitted writing the comments, which is much stronger evidence before a court than the original comment could ever be.
- stefantalpalaru 10y ago> Don't forget American folks that in most of the countries over here we don't have free speech ;) I wish people would stop reducing free speech to a US constitutional amendment. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." European Convention on Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."