What made this situation more interesting is that Washington Post cited comments from that edited thread in their article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/t

What made this situation more interesting is that Washington Post cited comments from that edited thread in their article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11/23/fearing-yet-another-witch-hunt-reddit-bans-pizzagate/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/11.... That's not a good look for Conde Nast - should the proper media cites now have a disclaimer that the user "apparently" wrote such and such post? I would guess that this exposure is also the reason he edited this thread in particular.