6 ms·

I think we can agree to disagree on which is worse. The next president is making a bunch of public actions that will be critiqued, audited, and probably checke

by cargo8 10y ago

I think we can agree to disagree on which is worse. The next president is making a bunch of public actions that will be critiqued, audited, and probably checked / balanced as the government was set up to do. The CEO of reddit is SECRETLY tampering / modifying the "speech" and content of private citizens without any checks, balances, or even repercussions (so far). I'd also argue that reddit has a more direct engagement model with private citizens that makes this hit closer to home (i.e. if we actually were real-life friends, or internet buddies for years, and one of our messages/comments to each other was modified that could cause far more direct impact — e.g. "you" convince me to commit a crime because you have my trust as a "personal" friend) I'm honestly surprised he publicly admitted to it at all, and I'd further be shocked if he doesn't end up stepping down because of this incident.

giarc 10y ago
Except Trump is doing it secretly. Many of the banned press members don't find out until they try to enter a press conference. We only know about it because they come out and say "Trumps security officials blocked me from entering". It's not like there is a list of who is allowed and who is not that is publically available. I guess my true point is the hypocrisy of T_D users complaining about spez's actions when the man they are so fond of is doing the same. Except he's the president.
- gamechangr 10y ago
  Maybe...but that's soo besides the point. Plenty of presidents do that - maybe all? This is not a partisan issue??? It's not the "T_D users complaining" that put it all over HN's. It's unacceptable for CEO's of social media companies to impersonate users. EVER > EVER > EVER. He could have deleted or changed the comments and posted a note and most of the outrage would go away, but he didn't. He impersonated and censored users comments. Such a slippery slope.

by cargo8 10y ago

giarc 10y ago

Except Trump is doing it secretly. Many of the banned press members don't find out until they try to enter a press conference. We only know about it because they come out and say "Trumps security officials blocked me from entering". It's not like there is a list of who is allowed and who is not that is publically available. I guess my true point is the hypocrisy of T_D users complaining about spez's actions when the man they are so fond of is doing the same. Except he's the president.

gamechangr 10y ago
Maybe...but that's soo besides the point. Plenty of presidents do that - maybe all? This is not a partisan issue??? It's not the "T_D users complaining" that put it all over HN's. It's unacceptable for CEO's of social media companies to impersonate users. EVER > EVER > EVER. He could have deleted or changed the comments and posted a note and most of the outrage would go away, but he didn't. He impersonated and censored users comments. Such a slippery slope.