> This is nonsense obviously, but it's a way of pointing out that the claim that the Python 3 VM can't be made to run Python 2 code is also nonsense. > This is

> This is nonsense obviously, but it's a way of pointing out that the claim that the Python 3 VM can't be made to run Python 2 code is also nonsense. > This is very, very obvious. Um...what? That in itself is nonsense. The reason he brought up Turing completeness is to make it seem like Python 3 breaks some fundamental programming 'law' that all programming languages should adhere to, in order to further his point. Sure, maybe the Python 3 VM should run Python 2 code, but he doesn't need to puff up his argument like this. It just makes him look uneducated.