> he claim by Gizmodo (and presumably the finder) is that the finder called the Apple customer service line and didn't get anything useful, thereby fulfilling t

> he claim by Gizmodo (and presumably the finder) is that the finder called the Apple customer service line and didn't get anything useful, thereby fulfilling the requirement. > The claim by those who say this was theft under CA law is that this did not fulfill the requirement, since it was found in a bar, and it is extremely reasonable to contact the bartender about a lost item that was found in the bar. Ahh, thanks for the clarification! That makes sense.