3 ms·
Your argument stands on tenuous ground because you just pointed out all the flaws that exist with "mail in" ballots. Did you know that states like Oregon only h
by jhatax 10y ago
Your argument stands on tenuous ground because you just pointed out all the flaws that exist with "mail in" ballots. Did you know that states like Oregon only have mail in ballots?
So, despite all the flaws that you point out, why are these legal but a mobile app is not?
- Scea91 10y agoI am actually from Europe so I don't know the specific details of your voting system. Mail-in ballots are of course a weakness, but it doesn't mean that we should further weaken the current system. Here in Czech Republic we receive voting tickets by mail about a week before election and have to physically put them into a box behing a curtain in a voting room. I also see weakness here, and don't understand why we receive voting tickets by mail, because it allows you family relatives filter your tickets. Better system would be if the voting tickets were available only in the voting room. Still it is better than web app. There are more security concerns with online voting, you can read more about it here: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15417/online-government-elections-system-is-it-possible https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15417/online-go...
- anigbrowl 10y agoIt's worth remembering (for non-US residents) that US voters don't just vote on a few legislative and executive candidates, but on a very large number of them. The California voter information booklet about who is running and what issues the voters can express a preference on regularly runs to over 100 pages. A completed ballot can easily involve >50 different decisions - hence the ubiquity of machine counting in the USA.
- mzw_mzw 10y agoGood point, and I'm not being sarcastic: we shouldn't have mail-in voting either, for exactly those same reasons.