3 ms·
"The issue here is Software Patents exist." And I can tell you, as a person who was out there fighting this for one of these companies, that it was very lonely
by DannyBee 10y ago
"The issue here is Software Patents exist."
And I can tell you, as a person who was out there fighting this for one of these companies, that it was very lonely, and still is.
I can tell you that when i've been out there fighting the good fight, people like MS have been actively opposed to changing the status quo (as has pretty much every other software industry company except possibly newegg :P)
They don't always come out and say it publicly, but they do so privately for sure.
Why do you believe nothing has changed?
Do you really think if companies representing many hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue went to congress and said "fix this" they wouldn't?
Certainly big pharma does everything they can to block it[1], but these industries are now worth about the same (~400 billion worldwide as of a few years ago).
It's really because there is no unified front in the software industry, but there is in pharma, etc.
This is one of the reasons i gave up and let it go further to crap - even if you were to publicly expose everyone's hypocrisy, it wouldn't change anything (the population they care about writ large just doesn't give a crap), and until these companies actually care about changing anything, nothing will happen.
[1] They want zero change because it's safer. You could say "software patents are special and expire in 5 years", but then what's to say the the next step isn't "pharma patents are special"
- thr0waway1239 10y agoWhy not declare a new patent pledge [1] against hiring anyone who applied for a software patent after, say, July 1 2017? Plenty of time for notice, there are enough software developers who are both smart and care enough about this issue that it shouldn't cause your hiring pool to suddenly shrink, those who keep finding justifications to apply for software patents are going to start using such a pledge to justify not applying for them, and most of all, the resulting changes for Big Tech is an excellent win-win situation for everyone concerned. Because I am guessing whatever revenue they do end up losing will be more than made up with the goodwill (and thus developer mindshare) they will accrue once they get all their employees on board. [1] http://www.paulgraham.com/patentpledge.html http://www.paulgraham.com/patentpledge.html
- tptacek 10y agoOne good reason not to have this hiring rule is that many employees work under contracts that require them to cooperate with patent filings; I had one that required me to cooperate even after I left the company.