3 ms·

that was much less interesting than i thought it would be...

• waqf 10y ago
  That was much more sane and reasonable than I thought it would be. Two sides of the same coin.
  • fbreduc 10y ago
    We've all known for quite some time that election system needs improvement, what's so different this time? Each and every election the losing side brings up the tampering bit, well yes if people cared enough, we should begin processes to make sure tampering election votes is extremely difficult to impossible. And maybe this is the beginning of real discussion, only problem is who will lead the effort, is this guy just another person with a megaphone? Also to say paper ballots cannot be tampered seems silly . Unless we know the exact procedure and check points in which they are handled, how they are stored and secured even after the win for case of recount (especially if tampering happens afterward and recount is the plan to which the coin lands on the other side). Hell maybe even down to the specific type of paper a ballot is printed with. And I like what someone else said, scan them in as well... have machine and human come to the same total. I expected the guy to have proof considering the hype around this, but I do appreciate he said it is unlikely the election was hacked...as if just to quiet those twitter echo chambers.