3 ms·
What's more concerning is the proposed route (via the BBFC) seems likely to return the UK to obscenity rules of the 80s. That means uncontroversial legal acts c
by anexprogrammer 10y ago
What's more concerning is the proposed route (via the BBFC) seems likely to return the UK to obscenity rules of the 80s. That means uncontroversial legal acts could be blocked too.
From the rather more in depth Guardian piece[1] on the topic "A spokeswoman for the BBFC said it would also check whether sites host “pornographic content that we would refuse to classify”.
“In making this assessment, we will apply the standards that we apply to pornography that is distributed offline,” she said. “If a website fails on either of these [age verification or obscene content] tests then a notification of non-compliance will be sent to the site.”
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-non-conventional-sex-acts-online-internet-pornography https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/23/censor-no...
- fredley 10y agoHere are some of the things that will not be classified by the BBFC (resulting in a total ban/censorship): > Pictures and videos that show spanking, whipping or caning that leaves marks, and sex acts involving urination, female ejaculation or menstruation as well as sex in public, or showing more than four digits inserted into an orifice for sexual stimulation.