Agreed. Many reports claim that e voting machines are in mostly poor voting locations, which could basically explain the 'discrepancy': http://www.reuters.com/a

Agreed. Many reports claim that e voting machines are in mostly poor voting locations, which could basically explain the 'discrepancy': http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-machines-idUSKCN11Q0EU http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-machines-idUS... But controlling for everything is almost impossible to be perfect: designated location vs county wide, income, race, education, Trump/Clinton modeled support. You'd have to pull actual voting returns by individual for those voting locations and states, and then have a good vote file. Then you can start to control for those variables and I would bet almost everything I have that doing so would reduce any irregularity these scholars are using as an argument that the election was somehow hacked.