4 ms·
I would argue the technicality you pointed out is a lot more minor than the OPs. The OP was basically talking about the JVM as if it was a language. *edit typ
by banachtarski 10y ago
I would argue the technicality you pointed out is a lot more minor than the OPs.
The OP was basically talking about the JVM as if it was a language.
*edit typo
- kqr 10y agoWell, there is a Jim language, it's just not something you'd want to write by hand...