3 ms·
To be clear, my point isn't that central planning is good. My point is that people may prefer centralized control for certain things even though they understand
by GabrielF00 10y ago
To be clear, my point isn't that central planning is good. My point is that people may prefer centralized control for certain things even though they understand what non-directed processes can accomplish.
To use the author's example of the post office, there may be reasons why one might want the post office to be a public entity beyond "only government could build such a complex system". For instance, it might be reasonable to wonder whether a postal system that evolved organically would cover everyone in a society, or would rural people or others who are expensive to reach be left out. Mail delivery probably qualifies as something we want everyone to have access to in order for a lot of our systems to function.
- noarchy 10y agoGovernments don't seem to want competition for their postal monopolies. There is the interesting case of the American Letter Mail Company, which tried to do this in the mid-1800s, but was shut down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Letter_Mail_Company https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Letter_Mail_Company