3 ms·
If they have a serious argument backed by evidence, they should make it public. Hillary Clinton may have a personal concern about the issue but it's a very seri
by hackuser 10y ago
If they have a serious argument backed by evidence, they should make it public. Hillary Clinton may have a personal concern about the issue but it's a very serious issue for all Americans (and the world). She shouldn't have a veto.
- whybroke 10y ago>She shouldn't have a veto. Absolutely. Regardless of how likely or unlikely manipulation is, an independent group should be able to request an audit. If for not other reason than she could be silenced by a tacitly threatening to endless prosecute and summon before congress on some unrelated matter if she makes any trouble.
- hackuser 10y ago> If for not other reason than she could be silenced by a tacitly threatening to endless prosecute and summon before congress on some unrelated matter if she makes any trouble. A very good point.
- stale2002 10y agoWould you say the same thing about the Democratic primary?
- whybroke 10y agoWhat a curious default view of humanity and reality.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]