Another option is Toptal, which I've heard is higher quality, and we're currently in the process of evaluating candidates with them. I've successfully used Upw

Another option is Toptal, which I've heard is higher quality, and we're currently in the process of evaluating candidates with them. I've successfully used Upwork for design and smaller development jobs. Nothing mission critical, but with a 4-figure spend per job, so all added up it's not pocket change. Here's what worked for me to find good freelancers, it's almost a bit of a marketing funnel concept applied to hiring: - filtering of the candidates that can see the job - screening questions - detailed job description - clear scoping of the deliverables and timelines - ask freelancers to reply with questions about the deliverables - sample of the work I want - video interview - daily check-ins once candidate is hired The filtering (by time zone, hours worked, skills, etc.) narrows your pool of potential candidates, but it's a first step of removing low quality from your funnel. Next are the screening questions - half of the freelancers don't even read them in detail. You fail the answers, that's it. If you can't read the instructions, then you probably can't do the job either. The scoping and questions about the deliverables helps me understand how the freelance thinks about the project. I look for people who can do small iterations and take feedback vs. sort of "pulling a rabbit out of the hat" type of personality. The work sample then gives me an understanding if we're on the same page. The video interview adds a personal touch and you can figure out if you'll be able to work together. That's fundamental, because once the project is underway, you really don't want daily check-ins with no "vibe" between the two of you. Finally - consider price. You get what you pay for. Going the lowest price, offshore route is not the way to go.