4 ms·
> they are used primarily by people trying to do very large transactions in an untraceable way And ? I don't want my large or small transactions traced, monito
by tdkl 10y ago
> they are used primarily by people trying to do very large transactions in an untraceable way
And ? I don't want my large or small transactions traced, monitored and monetized upon the untouchables called banks and I don't understand anyone who agrees with this but otherwise supports freedom and anonymity in tech.
The whole thing is just an excuse for more control.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jacobolus 10y agoUsing $20 bills wouldn’t make your all-cash transactions impossible. It would just make e.g. tax evasion, drug purchases, money laundering all a bit more cumbersome and conspicuous. The burden would fall heavily on illicit transactions, while only slightly impacting most cash users, if at all. (I’m not advocating for this, merely linking it as topical to the discussion.) See Ken Rogoff’s NBER paper http://scholar.harvard.edu/rogoff/publications/costs-and-benefits-phasing-out-paper-currency http://scholar.harvard.edu/rogoff/publications/costs-and-ben...
- lostboys67 10y agoQuiet a lot of Europeans buy cars in cash why not ban private ownership of gold and silver coins while your at it as well.
- shiven 10y agoYou mean like this? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1933_double_eagle https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1933_double_eagle
- mullen 10y agoPoor example. The government produced a coin and then ordered all of them melted down but 2. When 20 showed up, it is clear they were stolen and the government claimed their property. As a tax payer, I think this is a good idea.