3 ms·
> If that's a theory he has there, then you imply god and the spirit are not a theory That's just lazy. You can't shift the burden of proof on me when OP was t
by retina_sam 10y ago
> If that's a theory he has there, then you imply god and the spirit are not a theory
That's just lazy. You can't shift the burden of proof on me when OP was the one making the extraordinary claim (sufficiently sophisticated synapse simulations are guaranteed to result in emergent strong AI). If you want to demand proof of my claims, you'll need to post your demands to the comment in which I made the extraordinary claim.
- city41 10y agoIf you're going to dodge the question on a technicality, then frankly you're not worth the time.
- andrepd 10y agoThe existence of god is an extraordinary claim. The claim that replicating a brain at the molecular level will reproduce the behaviour of a brain is not an extraordinary claim. It's not even a claim, it's a fact.