3 ms·
Fine, but why without overhead? You're not addressing that. Why can't it unify the stack while making things slightly less efficient? It's not as though all of
by GavinMcG 10y ago
Fine, but why without overhead? You're not addressing that. Why can't it unify the stack while making things slightly less efficient? It's not as though all of the things we need to do as programmers are constrained by computation resources.
- Joky 10y agoIt depends what is meant by "unify" and what is the "stack". What I just read that a language is meant to "unify the full stack", I think I'll be able to rewrite with it any piece of the stack used, including my graphic driver, the network stack, etc. I believe most modern application are relying on underlying elements of "the stack" that need to be fast/low latency enough when interacting with each other. Unfortunately the C ABI is still king there...