3 ms·

Angry rhetoric against middlemen, how predictably simplistic of you.

• tormeh 10y ago
  >middlemen I think they're called enablers. The word accomplices comes to mind, but it may be a little bit too strong.
• drumttocs8 10y ago
  Predictable? You guys know each other IRL?
• gnarbarian 10y ago
  We ought to be angry sometimes. Maybe you'll like this one better: It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes. Distinctions in society will always exist under every just government. Equality of talents, of education, or of wealth can not be produced by human institutions. In the full enjoyment of the gifts of Heaven and the fruits of superior industry, economy, and virtue, every man is equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to add to these natural and just advantages artificial distinctions, to grant titles, gratuities, and exclusive privileges, to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society — the farmers, mechanics, and laborers — who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their government. There are no necessary evils in government. Its evils exist only in its abuses. If it would confine itself to equal protection, and, as Heaven does its rains, shower its favors alike on the high and the low, the rich and the poor, it would be an unqualified blessing. pretty damn relevant today. (rent seeking, crony capitalism, lobbyists writing the bills)
• dang 10y ago
  We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13010375 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13010375 and marked it off-topic.