6 ms·
Okay, that's telling, but the canary on its own seems to be valid still - it's from August 16, 2016, and they say it should be 'updated approximately once per q
by Anderkent 10y ago
Okay, that's telling, but the canary on its own seems to be valid still - it's from August 16, 2016, and they say it should be 'updated approximately once per quarter'
- mirimir 10y agoI certainly have no clue. I'm still getting email :) And they've had indirect FBI attention before: https://riseup.net/en/about-us/press/fbi-seizes-anonymous-remailer https://riseup.net/en/about-us/press/fbi-seizes-anonymous-re...
- cjbprime 10y ago> I'm still getting email :) The failure mode of their warrant canary is not that you stop getting email, but that other people start getting your email too.
- askmike 10y ago> I'm still getting email :) While obviously this is not about preventing you from "getting email", you might not have received everything. You should consider the service compromised.
- Seylerius 10y agoIf "quarter" is defined as "3 months", we're officially just on the outside of a quarter since the last update — 3 months and 5 days, to be precise.
- mirimir 10y agoWell, after (I'm sure) many inquiries about the canary, their latest update says nothing specific, just: > we have no plans on pulling the plug https://riseup.net/en/about-us/policy/government-faq https://riseup.net/en/about-us/policy/government-faq … https://twitter.com/riseupnet/status/800815181190217729 https://twitter.com/riseupnet/status/800815181190217729
- TillE 10y agoThis reads like a vague suggestion that everything is fine, but in context (ie, no clear denial) it's a huge red flag being waved.
- dsl 10y agoIf I were a scary government type and took control of riseup.net, that is exactly the thing I would post to twitter if I couldn't compel them to update the canary.