4 ms·
I think it's completely fine to use JavaScript here. It would be nice to have instant page pushes. But it should be rendering the site without a loading indica
by zackify 10y ago
I think it's completely fine to use JavaScript here. It would be nice to have instant page pushes.
But it should be rendering the site without a loading indicator. There's no reason that should be displayed
- gkya 10y agoWhat is a page push?
- jakobegger 10y agoI think in this case "page push" means that changes get sent automatically to the client via javascript (as opposed to "pulling" changes by pressing refresh. Completely useless for static sites, but nice to have while authoring.
- agentgt 10y ago> I think it's completely fine to use JavaScript here. It would be nice to have instant page pushes. I'm not sure I follow on the instant page pushes. Are you talking about a little dialog that pops up and "says a new version of the page" kind of thing? Second is there features you saw that required Javascript (as it appeared to me most could be done with CSS)? And no I don't think it is "completely fine" to use JavaScript particularly if you are trying to spread the word as quickly as possible and don't care about looks (ie most devices, loads fast, low power). There are also a growing amount of people that have Javascript disabled in general.
- hayd 10y agoOne solution is to just send all the linked pages on first load (all the markdown content, so when transitioning they only load images, or of seen before get them "from cache").
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]