3 ms·
> and works well with Mac household.. Sad face. Apart from Apple's and Google's idiotic antics, what routers require anything more than a browser to configure?
by Nullabillity 10y ago
> and works well with Mac household.. Sad face.
Apart from Apple's and Google's idiotic antics, what routers require anything more than a browser to configure?
- NickNameNick 10y agoI've seen a disturbing number of routers which have web interfaces that only work with old versions of IE. Good luck configuring that with a mac....
- wahern 10y agoRequiring a browser implies that the device has a full web stack on it, including one of Perl, PHP, or Node.js. That's the last thing I want on my WiFi router, or any router! As annoying as it is for some, the configuration interface for Apple AirPort used a simple SNMP interface. Now, lots of SNMP software has had bugs and remote exploits, but all things being equal it's a much simpler interface to export and requires shipping less code, not least because it doesn't have to support a GUI, directly or indirectly. That said, I always configure my WiFi router (AirPort or w'ever) in bridging mode and put them behind my gateway. And I try to disable any web GUI entirely if at all possible. People who use the built-in WiFi capabilities of their Cable or DSL modems are begging to be hacked.
- extra88 10y ago> Requiring a browser implies that the device has a full web stack on it, including one of Perl, PHP, or Node.js. Not really, CGI can be written in anything, shell scripting, C, whatever. But security-wise, it doesn't much matter the language because the programmers working on the web interfaces of such embedded devices rarely do a good job.
- Nullabillity 10y ago> That's the last thing I want on my WiFi router, or any router! Considering the amount of crappy C most routers have, that's probably the least of your concerns.