3 ms·
I've been using Route53 for the last 3 years, and I'll vouch for it. It's pretty sweet -- the UI is clear, but allows for a decent amount of configuration, and
by verandaguy 10y ago
I've been using Route53 for the last 3 years, and I'll vouch for it. It's pretty sweet -- the UI is clear, but allows for a decent amount of configuration, and it's reliable. It also integrates with major registrars (GANDI's a big one) and lets you manage domain ownership via an AWS account -- and personally, I prefer unified bills.
- cpks 10y agoI'll anti-vouch for Route53 for personal use. I use AWS pretty broadly, but with something like DNS, I like having a little bit more support if things go wrong. Amazon won't do much without a $upport contract. It's fine for business use with a support contract.
- stevekemp 10y agoRoute53 is awesome. I personally wrap it in git - https://dns-api.com/ https://dns-api.com/ - and remove the per-query pricing to provide stability.