4 ms·

Different article: http://uk.businessinsider.com/pivotal-906-am-breakfast-meeting-2016-6?r=US&IR=T http://uk.businessinsider.com/pivotal-906-am-breakfast-meeti

by UK-AL 10y ago

Different article: http://uk.businessinsider.com/pivotal-906-am-breakfast-meeting-2016-6?r=US&IR=T http://uk.businessinsider.com/pivotal-906-am-breakfast-meeti... "So Pivotal decided to employ both a stick and a carrot. The stick is a mandatory morning meeting at 9 a.m., where your absence will likely be noted. The carrot is the breakfast buffet, "sort of a prize to get in," Mee says."

jacques_chester 10y ago
I don't agree with that characterisation, which gives a Taylorist vibe. I've never noticed anyone marking a roll, punching a card or scanning the room.
- UK-AL 10y ago
  That's because it is. Placing meeting at 9 AM is manipulative way of putting social pressure on people to get in at 9am without making it policy.
  - jacques_chester 10y ago
    In my case it's a very impressive act of manipulation, since I eat breakfast at home before coming in. I guess I don't see it your way. The word "manipulative" implies two things: first, that I am a dupe. And second, that there is a malicious intent to trick people into doing something against their interest. I've been at Pivotal for three years. If the intent is malicious, then it's been executed with such universal and flawless attention to detail across every manager and director I've dealt with that I am simply unable to distinguish it from honesty. Given that it's indistinguishable, I'm just going to pretend I work for and with honest people, no matter how perfect their conspiracy to be nice to me might be.