4 ms·
Sure, they have their ARM core CPUs that have proven to be decent, but I don't see them blowing anyone out of the water with them What? Their first iterations
by gcp 10y ago
Sure, they have their ARM core CPUs that have proven to be decent, but I don't see them blowing anyone out of the water with them
What? Their first iterations were somewhat meh (Tegra K1 with Denver 1 in the Nexus 9), but the latter iterations and reoriented focus (Jetson K1, K1 with A15s, Denver2) having been scoring some excellent design wins.
- lgeek 10y agoNVIDIA had about 5 different generations of Tegra before the K1 [1]. The A15-based K1 (T124) came before the Denver-based K1 (T132) AFAIK. Both are very nice and a clear improvement over the previous generations. Denver is a bit inconsistent in its performance, but on average it dominates A15s and A57s. Nexus 9, however, has very poor thermal design and can only dissipate a small fraction of the heat output of the T132. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tegra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tegra
- jandrese 10y agoMore to the point, those previous 5 generations were generally disappoting. Slow chips with decent but not mindblowing graphics, and extremely short support windows that left early adopters flapping in the breeze. Nvidia had quite a bit of ground to make up, but from what I've seen of their latest chips they made it. I think they're the fastest mobile chips you can buy this side of Apple's monsters.
- gcp 10y agoTegra2 was notoriously one of the few ARMv7 chips without NEON. I actually agree that Denver 1 in the K1 is really fast, but it's not scored many designs wins, perhaps exactly because of the thermal restraints. The A15 based design seems to have less of that problem.