3 ms·
> If there was an equally qualified man and woman- choosing the man over the woman because he is a man would be considered sexism. Bzzt. The only folks that b
by foolrush 10y ago
> If there was an equally qualified man and woman- choosing the man over the woman because he is a man would be considered sexism.
Bzzt.
The only folks that believe this rubbish believe that all things are equal. This is false.
The cultural framework and machinations have already greatly tilted the field in favor of the male, and in particular the white male.
So if you believe this suddenly is sexism, you may want to check the current sociological landscape.
- foolrush 10y agoWhat would be fascinating is if one's down voting were coupled with their identified gender and race.
- ihsw 10y agoThe sociological landscape is irrelevant and employers pandering to liberal nitwits is the height of stupidity. Frankly I think affirmative action is disgusting and it devalues us all. Progressive extremism truly is a cancer upon the tech industry (and humanity as a whole) and I hope the Western world gets its collective head out of its behind, no other section of the world buys into this garbage and for good reason -- it's empty gestures that serve only to stave off the wrath of violent SJWs that seek to pervert society with their backwards ideals. It's a policy borne of fear, fear of being smeared on Twitter and other leftist propaganda outlets. There is no other rationale.
- flukus 10y agoSo you can dismiss arguments based on the gender and race of those making them?