4 ms·

Didn't get to prod. Looked at it around Juneish 2016. High error rates, no SLA, slow boot times, no tooling, deeply inadequate logging. My technical recommenda

by pnathan 10y ago

Didn't get to prod. Looked at it around Juneish 2016. High error rates, no SLA, slow boot times, no tooling, deeply inadequate logging. My technical recommendation is as follows: "No".

discodave 10y ago
What about the logging is inadequate? CloudWatch Logs seems to work pretty well.
- iwintermute 10y ago
  Not the original poster, but IIRC cloud watch improved a lot in recent months - before that web interface was kinda hard to use with all the log streams, right now it's much easier to search for some event for example (time brackets were added, auto-loading of previous event if I'm not mistaking)
- pnathan 10y ago
  Compared to, e.g., kibana, splunk, or `cat`, I find it effectively useless. The UI is ... ungood.