4 ms·
The wonderful thing about "or" is that you can keep adding on to it and only one statement has to be true. "or not". I'll go with "or not". In any world where y
by sebringj 10y ago
The wonderful thing about "or" is that you can keep adding on to it and only one statement has to be true. "or not". I'll go with "or not". In any world where you have beginning programmers, or programmers not used to Lisp seeing ))))))))) at the end of a line, this is cognitively difficult to keep track of the number of closing braces without having some editor assist you doing the counting for you. This reminds me of indenting in python being touted as easier than having brackets as whitespace matters but editing is terrible without having line guides turned on when any deeper nesting arises.
- veddox 10y ago> without having some editor assist you doing the counting for you The problem with your statement is in just this point: everybody does have an editor that does this for you ;-) Unless you write code with ed, or Windows Notepad, I don't know of a single editor out there that doesn't do this.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- kazinator 10y agowithout having some editor assist you doing the counting for you. We. Have. Those. I wouldn't use any editor which can't do this and would have no reason to. I wouldn't use it for Lisp. I also wouldn't use it for editing C, Makefiles, shell scripts, or anything else. Speaking of makefiles, here is a quote: vmlinux-alldirs := $(sort $(vmlinux-dirs) $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, \ $(init-) $(core-) $(drivers-) $(net-) $(libs-) $(virt-)))) ^^^^ ! That is from: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Makefile https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Makefile Maybe you should try arguing your inane point on the Linux kernel mailing list!