4 ms·
Good, tightly written article. I think there's another reason I was expecting to see but didn't - when people say "social media" they usually mean Twitter, and
by zigzigzag 10y ago
Good, tightly written article. I think there's another reason I was expecting to see but didn't - when people say "social media" they usually mean Twitter, and Twitter seems to be optimised for creating huge dramas and flamewars. I think it must be the character limit. You can't say anything really interesting in 140 characters, so much of what's said ends up being so compressed all nuance and explanation is lost. Also the site encourages you to just blurt out whatevers on your mind without thinking about it. It's no surprise that Donald Trump had his Twitter access taken away from him towards the end of his campaign.
- humanrebar 10y ago> I think it must be the character limit. I think it's how easy it is to get the last word in and check out of the conversation without any real consequences or feedback. Everyone gets their smug win in, even the lurkers. No real understanding is promoted. The character limit is a problem, but that has simple workarounds (blogging, tweet storms, text images) if that was a real issue.