5 ms·

Santa Cruz, California has been doing this for a few years. It mostly works well but those bathrooms get trashed.

jdavis703 10y ago
Yes I was wondering how this would work in San Francisco. There is a large mental illness and drug abuse problem, many who suffer from these issues find it very difficult to leave a bathroom in at least a semi-decent state. Does the city maybe wind up paying enough to the businesses so they hire someone to keep the restroom clean?
- oscardelben 10y ago
  I think you'll find that mentally ill people are treated differently in Europe, that would be a necessary first step of your want to do something similar in sf.
  - jsemrau 10y ago
    The low cost for healthcare usually helps, in addition to the social net. A social democracy surely has it's benefits. *Not to be going into a political debate here.
  - jdavis703 10y ago
    Yes I spend a couple of months every year in Europe so I'm aware. The thing is health care is better, drug abuse (not use, but abuse) seems lower and also society has less tolerance for acting out. I've got a lot of mental illness issues in my family, so I hopefully can say this without sounding rude. But a lot of people dealing with mental episodes can to some extent moderate their behaviour. Not that it's easy, but the ability is there. However particularly in SF we are very tolerant, maybe to the point of causing more harm than good. So then some people just indulge in their every impulse including engaging in poor sanitary habits.
- tomjen3 10y ago
  The post toilets in Germany typically have somebody sitting there, constantly cleaning the toilets.
- discordianfish 10y ago
  While I agree that SF has a much larger drug abuse / mental illness problem, that problem exists in Berlin as well - even with the better health care system and unemployment benefits. One thing to keep in mind when comparing homelessness in Berlin and SF is the clima. I don't know how much it contributes but homeless people in Berlin risk to freeze to dead. So I could imaging homeless people prefering warmer cities.
  - haffla 10y ago
    As if homeless people had a choice to become homeless or not.
    - eliaspro 10y ago
      Well, at least in Germany there's virtually no homelessness due to a lack of resources. The government has to provide sufficient housing. The reasons for homelessness around here are most of the time different ones than "can't afford to pay rent". In many cases mental health issues and bureaucratic hurdles which might be too high to tackle for those stuck in a difficult situation. It's mostly down to having Street Workers which are able to connect to those people and help them doing the first steps into the right direction.
    - manarth 10y ago
      People don't usually have a choice about becoming homeless, but their environment will affect how they respond to their homelessness. It's a cliché that some homeless people in America will choose to travel to California or Florida for the warmer climate (whether that's true or not I have no idea - would be interested in seeing data on that subject). If someone becomes homeless in a place where homelessness has a significantly increased risk of death (such as freezing to death in Berlin), then either they move away, they engage with local support services, or they carry on as they are, risking death (and some of them will die as a result). Either way, the effect is a reduction in the number of homeless people at that location. Thankfully a lot of places recognise some of the risks and try to address them. In the UK, many cities have a cold-weather response: when the temperature drops below Xº, additional shelters are opened, and street-teams look for people sleeping rough and guide them towards the shelters.
HillaryBriss 10y ago
Los Angeles has a large homeless population, and, if this sounds unfair, well I apologize, but, a significant fraction of LA's homeless people smell bad. I'm not trying to criticize homeless people and I'm sure there are good reasons for that fact such as lack of bathing facilities and access to clean clothing. If LA had a program paying cafes and restaurants a monthly fee to allow the general population (which would have to include the homeless) to use their restrooms, I predict that the vast majority of businesses would not participate. A restaurant owner would simply not want a smelly person parading through their dining space to get to the restroom. In short, I don't see a way to make this work in Los Angeles.

Yes I was wondering how this would work in San Francisco. There is a large mental illness and drug abuse problem, many who suffer from these issues find it very difficult to leave a bathroom in at least a semi-decent state. Does the city maybe wind up paying enough to the businesses so they hire someone to keep the restroom clean?

oscardelben 10y ago
I think you'll find that mentally ill people are treated differently in Europe, that would be a necessary first step of your want to do something similar in sf.
- jsemrau 10y ago
  The low cost for healthcare usually helps, in addition to the social net. A social democracy surely has it's benefits. *Not to be going into a political debate here.
- jdavis703 10y ago
  Yes I spend a couple of months every year in Europe so I'm aware. The thing is health care is better, drug abuse (not use, but abuse) seems lower and also society has less tolerance for acting out. I've got a lot of mental illness issues in my family, so I hopefully can say this without sounding rude. But a lot of people dealing with mental episodes can to some extent moderate their behaviour. Not that it's easy, but the ability is there. However particularly in SF we are very tolerant, maybe to the point of causing more harm than good. So then some people just indulge in their every impulse including engaging in poor sanitary habits.
tomjen3 10y ago
The post toilets in Germany typically have somebody sitting there, constantly cleaning the toilets.
discordianfish 10y ago
While I agree that SF has a much larger drug abuse / mental illness problem, that problem exists in Berlin as well - even with the better health care system and unemployment benefits. One thing to keep in mind when comparing homelessness in Berlin and SF is the clima. I don't know how much it contributes but homeless people in Berlin risk to freeze to dead. So I could imaging homeless people prefering warmer cities.
- haffla 10y ago
  As if homeless people had a choice to become homeless or not.
  - eliaspro 10y ago
    Well, at least in Germany there's virtually no homelessness due to a lack of resources. The government has to provide sufficient housing. The reasons for homelessness around here are most of the time different ones than "can't afford to pay rent". In many cases mental health issues and bureaucratic hurdles which might be too high to tackle for those stuck in a difficult situation. It's mostly down to having Street Workers which are able to connect to those people and help them doing the first steps into the right direction.
  - manarth 10y ago
    People don't usually have a choice about becoming homeless, but their environment will affect how they respond to their homelessness. It's a cliché that some homeless people in America will choose to travel to California or Florida for the warmer climate (whether that's true or not I have no idea - would be interested in seeing data on that subject). If someone becomes homeless in a place where homelessness has a significantly increased risk of death (such as freezing to death in Berlin), then either they move away, they engage with local support services, or they carry on as they are, risking death (and some of them will die as a result). Either way, the effect is a reduction in the number of homeless people at that location. Thankfully a lot of places recognise some of the risks and try to address them. In the UK, many cities have a cold-weather response: when the temperature drops below Xº, additional shelters are opened, and street-teams look for people sleeping rough and guide them towards the shelters.

HillaryBriss 10y ago

Los Angeles has a large homeless population, and, if this sounds unfair, well I apologize, but, a significant fraction of LA's homeless people smell bad. I'm not trying to criticize homeless people and I'm sure there are good reasons for that fact such as lack of bathing facilities and access to clean clothing. If LA had a program paying cafes and restaurants a monthly fee to allow the general population (which would have to include the homeless) to use their restrooms, I predict that the vast majority of businesses would not participate. A restaurant owner would simply not want a smelly person parading through their dining space to get to the restroom. In short, I don't see a way to make this work in Los Angeles.