3 ms·
> We agree on that, my point is that C++ does it via libraries, Rust does it by hiding unsafe blocks behind interfaces (aka libraries). That's a false equivale
by burntsushi 10y ago
> We agree on that, my point is that C++ does it via libraries, Rust does it by hiding unsafe blocks behind interfaces (aka libraries).
That's a false equivalency and completely ignores the fact that C++ is one giant `unsafe` block.
> but until the it isn't clear that the Rust approach is statistically better than the C++ approach
Could you please explain what kind of evidence would convince you?
- braveo 10y ago> That's a false equivalency and completely ignores the fact that C++ is one giant `unsafe` block. This is exactly what I meant when I said rust people miss the forest for the trees. > Could you please explain what kind of evidence would convince you? you quoted me explaining what I would need.