3 ms·
First, a possibly interesting article: https://partners.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000611mag-phenomenon.html https://partners.nytimes.com/library/magaz
by eth0up 10y ago
First, a possibly interesting article: https://partners.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000611mag-phenomenon.html https://partners.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000611m...
Another article by The Guardian, states that the unabridged explanation for discontinuing the Xjet remains classified; but as you intimate, citations seem on walkabout. I combed some patents for refs on the ceiling-limit and found nothing, to my surprise. I also visited (virtually) both the National Museum of the US Air Force, and Museum of Flight, but curiously couldn't find any results for "X-jet", "Xjet", or "X jet" nor other related keywords. NoScript? Your replies are appreciated, but I remain sincerely perplexed by the persistent obscurity of this fantastic machine. More particularly perplexing is the present year, 2016, where despite solid evidence of a bona fide, functional dream-machine from the 80s offering ballistic capabilities that most humans still futilely fantasize about, we have no tangible modern counterpart to. Even if the X-jet could scarcely tower a hunched inch above the treeline as you mention, it's an inch more free and exhilarating than the best scripted and predictable tangent of any popular rollercoaster. So, respectfully, my question endures.
PS: I am no adversary of sausages and am wondering if pinewurst is a genuine product. I immediately think of rosemary, which is a necessary spice in many recipes.
- pinewurst 10y agoI think the answer is that both don't have websites designed for people doing research beyond "what's the cafe menu?" I've been physically to both museums and the USAF museum is truly breathtaking. The Museum of Flight is far less so. I think civilian flying platforms, without some sort of modern fail-safe stability augmentation, would be a regulatory and liability nightmare. Plus the costs would be crazy, if not to buy and operate, to maintain. Zero-timing a jet engine is not a small expense and it's continual. P.S. My nom-de-HN is a tribute to a defunct project's code name. It was a sausage with a thin skin of delusion well stuffed with bad judgment and strongly seasoned with incompetence. Not to my taste at all. P.P.S. There seems to be a lot more info under "WASP" than "X-jet".