2 ms·
This is dead on, IMHO. I mean, we joke about some language, company, or product being fetishistically backwards compatible, but we've got nothing on music, whic
by qwertyuiop924 10y ago
This is dead on, IMHO. I mean, we joke about some language, company, or product being fetishistically backwards compatible, but we've got nothing on music, which is somehow backwards compatability obsessed, but also not actually backwards compatable, because note frequencies have slipped, and most people only know a tiny subset of the actual notation.
Math is even worse. It's syntax piled on top of syntax. It's actually evil.
- GFK_of_xmaspast 10y ago> note frequencies have slipped Surely you're not talking about modern tuning standards.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoOld tuning frequencies varied: The actual frequencies of the notes weren't standardized for centuries.