3 ms·
You can't 'open source' more land. Whomever controls the natural resources will control how they're used.
by ZenoArrow 10y ago
You can't 'open source' more land. Whomever controls the natural resources will control how they're used.
- mdpopescu 10y agoThe amount of unused land in the world is mind-boggling. The amount of unused land in the most populous countries in the world is mind-boggling.
- ZenoArrow 10y agoJust because it's unused doesn't mean it's not owned by someone. Besides, what happens when all land is owned, what about the generations that follow?
- mdpopescu 10y agoI think it's a bit early to try and solve all future problems. Those poor people who will have no jobs need something to do, right? :) [I agree that "it's owned by someone" can be a problem more than "there's not enough land". Unfortunately, that's politics so I have no quick solution.]
- ZenoArrow 10y ago"there's not enough land" wasn't my original point, it was about control of that land, I'm glad you agree it's a problem. As for what happens to the poor in future generations, it depends on bringing out the best in those with the power to choose. I don't think the alternative is helpful to entertain at this point. The only question is whether we can mature as a race to share without force, or whether balance will be made using force (government coercion, etc...). It's a question about how much faith we have in the human race to grow up quickly.