3 ms·
tomp maybe Breitbart got brought up for content like this: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/08/birth-control-makes-women-unattractive-and-crazy/ http://ww
by opsiprogram 10y ago
tomp maybe Breitbart got brought up for content like this:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/08/birth-control-makes-women-unattractive-and-crazy/ http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/08/birth-control-makes...
It's mostly unsubstantiated claims, without scientific rigor to back them up (ex: they cite papers but misrepresent the findings), and heavily mixed with personal opinion. Breitbart may have been right about the election, but that doesn't really seem to be because the website is dedicated to clear objective journalism... Wouldn't you agree?
- tomp 10y ago> It's mostly unsubstantiated claims, without scientific rigor to back them up (ex: they cite papers but misrepresent the findings), and heavily mixed with personal opinion. Sounds like pretty much any non-scientific media citing scientific articles.
- opsiprogram 10y agoOkay, so other news sources also can be biased/wrong/misrepresent science ... how does that make this Breitbart article more accurate? or Breitbart a more objective news source?
- tomp 10y agoNah, same bullshit (neither more nor less fake), just in the other direction. Best to read both left-ist and right-ist media to avoid bias. Although personally I sometimes find Breitbart more agreeable, as they seem opposed to political correctness and unafraid of voicing inconvenient truths (opinions?).
- hga 10y agoIt's Milo being Milo, which any regular reader of Breitbart, or anyone sensitive to nuance and style, would realize is more opinion than official un/less biased "news".