3 ms·
> Breitbart and classifies it (arguably correctly) as fake news Yeah, fine line between fake news and something that is just extremely slanted. where that rid
by serge2k 10y ago
> Breitbart and classifies it (arguably correctly) as fake news
Yeah, fine line between fake news and something that is just extremely slanted.
where that ridiculous stuff about the podesta "spirit dinner" fall?
Where does something like this
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/10/22/wikileaks-podesta-emails-clinton-foundation-works-with-big-pharma-to-keep-aids-drug-prices-high/comment-page-1/ https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/10/22/wikileaks-podest...
fall? It's based on an email, but the content is, IMO, pretty low quality. It talks about unrelated things, and ignores context to portray a skewed version of facts.
Despite that, you could argue that yes it is a fact based news source and should be allowed.
- hga 10y agoIt's rather less ridiculous when you look at the artwork he displays in his office and home. I believe that's one of the things that gave all this traction, something is seriously wrong here, even if it's just a few sick souls. One of whom just happened to be the chairman of Hillary's campaign. If you believe the Clinton Machine is evil, and you're open to supernatural explanations for evil (I myself am not willing to rule them out), well, we can go so far as demonic possession, that's straight out of the New Testament, Jesus driving demons out of people.