5 ms·

And what about the -36F drops in siberia!

• napsterbr 10y ago
  It's just as bad. It's not about warming itself, but drastic climate changes. Both changes are really really bad for the environment and ecosystem.
  • exclusiv 10y ago
    Tell that to the sun, which is 99.9% of the mass of the solar system.
    • grzm 10y ago
      What do you mean? Maybe I need another cup of coffee.
      • exclusiv 10y ago
        Haha probably me too. :) I agree that drastic changes are bad for the environment, but the sun doesn't care and it's basically our entire universe. From the article's intro: "As the Arctic settles into polar night, scientists are noticing that something has gone horribly wrong." What's horribly wrong? Would scientists say a volcano is horribly wrong because it's rumbling? The climate is always changing and we have a very short history of data. I just keep seeing these types of articles which are supposed to be scientific. Scientists are making observations but that's it. It's always the first step. These scientists are glorified weathermen. I don't see anything about what's going on with the sun or the moon which I find disturbing.
        • grzm 10y ago
          Yeah, "wrong" is definitely anthropocentric. Then again, I'm biased :)
        • Oletros 10y ago
          > The climate is always changing and we have a very short history of data. > These scientists are glorified weathermen > I don't see anything about what's going on with the sun or the moon which I find disturbing. Three of the most wrong arguments done by deniers
          • exclusiv 10y ago
            I'm not denying the climate changes. Please show me the reports that include data on solar and lunar activity. Extremely few and far between and you know it.
        • majewsky 10y ago
          > The climate is always changing and we have a very short history of data. At least 20000 years, visualized nicely at https://xkcd.com/1732/ https://xkcd.com/1732/