4 ms·
"I didn't claim that W3C is breaking a license, just that they are taking other people's work and claiming it as their own." The only reason I ask? If there's
by bootload 10y ago
"I didn't claim that W3C is breaking a license, just that they are taking other people's work and claiming it as their own."
The only reason I ask? If there's a license you can force the W3C to display it. I can see what you're getting at, and if the W3C as an organisation is stupid enough to make claims on ideas from WHATWG they should be reminded and forced to acknowledge this through law. One way to do this is enforcement by license.
- tannhaeuser 10y agoIt's absurd to think that W3C is claiming WHATWG's work as their own. W3C specs are read by relatively few people who generally know about the text provenance and its relationship with WHATWG specs.