3 ms·
IANALE-either but from my understanding the Pardon is so wide (only restriction being preventing from stopping an impeachment) that the President can and has Pa
by ltnately 10y ago
IANALE-either but from my understanding the Pardon is so wide (only restriction being preventing from stopping an impeachment) that the President can and has Pardoned people preemptively. There are some other limits on it as well for practical uses.
Most notably, President Ford pardoned President Nixon for basically anything he might have done as opposed to specific charges.
Slate Article on the Subject: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2008/07/preemptive_presidential_pardons.html http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/20...
- dllthomas 10y ago> Pardoned people preemptively. Preemptive of any investigation/indictment/etc. Not, as I understand it, in advance of the illegal action itself. (Not a distinction relevant here, of course, just clarifying)
- _up 10y agoObama just gave an interview in Germany where he argued that he can't pardon Snowden. Interview: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/spiegel-interview-with-us-president-barack-obama-a-1122008.html http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/spiegel-interview-...
- dllthomas 10y agoThat's baffling. It's happened before multiple times, and Obama really should know that. Anyone have a conjecture as to what's going on there? Does he in fact not know? Is he somehow confused? Is he just lying? Were the previous examples secretly invalid? Is there a meaningful distinction between this case and those?