3 ms·
It is expected that the smallest attack surface will have less critical vulnerabilities, comparing an entire distro gives you a different picture, since categor
by Aldo_MX 10y ago
It is expected that the smallest attack surface will have less critical vulnerabilities, comparing an entire distro gives you a different picture, since categories like code execution get similar results.
The stark contrast is in the privilege escalation vulnerabilities from the Windows side vs the other categories on the Linux side.
I would assume that many persons prefer a server to go down, corrupt its data and leak it, rather than get compromised. The fine print is that the leaked data may contain information to compromise the server[1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed
- Vendan 10y agoYeah, but now you swung in the opposite direction. Look at Debian Linux's 2016 code exec vulns and you'll see it's got a like Firefox and Chrome and Drupal and Mercurial... not exactly OS components... whereas the windows 10 vulns are are windows OS components. I'd personally be curious if any of those "debian vulns" would be equally applicable to the same software installed on windows.