3 ms·
> Interestingly, by 14 CFR 43.3(k) even the "official" method described in the article is noncompliant, as the device is removed from the aircraft, and put into
by peckrob 10y ago
> Interestingly, by 14 CFR 43.3(k) even the "official" method described in the article is noncompliant, as the device is removed from the aircraft, and put into a docking-station at home, loaded via RS232.
It's not noncompliant, it just means that owner maintenance on this GPS isn't possible and has to be done by a specialist. A general rule I go by is if something needs to come out of the panel, it needs a mechanic or avionics tech to do. This unit is from 1996. IIRC we weren't allowed to do our own updates until 2012 or so. So it's not surprising that owner maintenance may not be legally possible on it.
I can pretty easily construct a scenario where doing something like this gets you in trouble. Chances are nothing will happen but it's all about your risk tolerance. Mine is pretty low.
- matheweis 10y agoHe has added an interesting disclaimer "Please note: I am in no way saying that you can, should, or are allowed to fly with a card updated in this way (even though the bits in it are identical). I am not claiming that I plan to or am flying with such a card. All experimentation was performed on a card and a GPS that is not used for IFR flight." Also author appears to have commented on this thread with a similar disclaimer. Very neat hack, but yea, walking a very fine line with the relevant aviation authority :(