3 ms·
if you've read wikileaks, you would know that the New York Times is a known colluder with the Clinton Campaign and therefore can't be trusted with any political
by ryanx435 10y ago
if you've read wikileaks, you would know that the New York Times is a known colluder with the Clinton Campaign and therefore can't be trusted with any political coverage.
- perseusprime11 10y agoThis election taught me an important lesson about our media. I stop subscribing to CNN, FoxNews, NYTimes, and Washington Post. I will not click on any of their links or tweet their links for that matter. I signed up for Intercept for my daily dose of news. So far the reporting is excellent!
- grzm 10y agoI think it's good to keep a critical eye on the news you consume. Perhaps I'm misreading, but please don't rely on just one source. I encourage you to read a variety of sources.
- d_e_solomon 10y agoThat's roughly the equivalent of trading a diet of donuts for a diet of cocaine. One's not healthy, the other will make you crazy.
- perseusprime11 10y agoIsn't that what's happening on Twitter? More bubbles for future....https://www.fastcompany.com/3065777/inside-gab-the-new-twitter-alternative-championed-by-the-alt-right https://www.fastcompany.com/3065777/inside-gab-the-new-twitt...
- rokosbasilisk 10y agoSame. Wikileaks really showed the corruption runs deep.
- TheCowboy 10y agoI think you have to say more than this else it just amounts to a non-constructive partisan comment. Wikileaks does zero curation. No human-being has the time to read everything they post, and there is still a problem of verifying the authenticity of sources.
- rokosbasilisk 10y agowikileaks has search functions. Its worth taking a look.
- ryanx435 10y agoWikiLeaks have been out for a rrally long time. They have been a key focal point of the political discussion for over a year. There are thousands of reddit and other forum posts that have sifted through and analyzed them. There are hundreds of published articles about them in the media. I don't "have to say more than this" because it has already been said a thousand times over. At what point does it become willful ignorance on your part? Seriously, spend 20 minutes today, do a bing search, find an article or reddit thread that links to the relevant emails, and do some reading and decide for yourself.
- davesque 10y agoIf you read the article, you can see that they link to the Oxford study which makes the claim. So is Oxford also not trust-worthy for some reason?