> - all of which counter the methods of science. Of the 21st Century Scientific Method? Are you also going to look down at the Greek Philosophers? Their method

> - all of which counter the methods of science. Of the 21st Century Scientific Method? Are you also going to look down at the Greek Philosophers? Their method was also wrong. You are judging history with a 21st Century mindset and that isn't fair to Newton or Copernicus (Who's myth is also bigger then Galileo). Heck medicine was still doing blood letting during the founding of United States. > it's not much of a stretch to say that the church has a history of fighting the essential components of the scientific method. That is such a wrong statement and has been debunked by the fact that science was propelled through and by the church. The VERY fact that this article list all the scientific / Astronomical features in Catholic Churches Sorry I was in the process of getting a PhD in Historical Theology and not a Pro Catholic shill. * Francis Bacon was really the founder of the modern Scientific Method, correct? Did you read his other book? Like his translation of 7 Psalms from the Bible or his many essays and books regarding Theology? Science and Theology didn't clash like people would like to say and I actually say the reverse we are ahead of the technology curve because of the Church, Mosques and Synagogues. This war we see from extremism is actually a very modern creation.