There is no redefinition occurring here. Your claim was this: > Yes Apple backdoors their phones for government surveillance access. That very specifically is

There is no redefinition occurring here. Your claim was this: > Yes Apple backdoors their phones for government surveillance access. That very specifically is referring to the phone itself. Nobody would be arguing if you had said: "Apple hands over non-encrypted information (such as webmail and other data that cannot be encrypted at a higher level) from iCloud and iTunes Store servers, in response to a valid legal demand"