3 ms·
Security through obscurity. I thought we all have learned that it doesn't work. Well, good riddance, KasperskyOS! "And then there are some details that will re
by jwildeboer 10y ago
Security through obscurity. I thought we all have learned that it doesn't work. Well, good riddance, KasperskyOS!
"And then there are some details that will remain for certain customers’ eyes only forever, to ward off cyber-terrorist abuses."
https://eugene.kaspersky.com/2012/10/16/kl-developing-its-own-operating-system-we-confirm-the-rumors-and-end-the-speculation/ https://eugene.kaspersky.com/2012/10/16/kl-developing-its-ow...
- wjnc 10y agoI agree. What I find interesting is that real world security is also a function of popularity. You won't get many outside hackers to attack a platform, if it's hardly used. So any new platform would first need broad adoption, then a few years of maturity in able for the outside world to assess if it's more secure than current systems. Obviously, security centric design helps a lot, but on the other hand Kaspersky is a relatively small player in comparison with the other OS-movements (whether capitalist or FOSS).
- bigato 10y agoPopularity is not exactly what attracts most hackers nowadays; it's profit. Yes, in the common case, the more popular the system, the more profit can be made by hacking it. But if a system is running on a few, but very strategic places, it will be an interesting target and thus attract a lot of effort.
- JonnieCache 10y ago>Security through obscurity. I thought we all have learned that it doesn't work We've all learned that it can't be relied upon as a sole defence.